Loving this eco-system that Todd And highlighted. It shows all the Web 2.0 sites and ranks them
according to estimated market value and their Alexa ranking, so that
you can see quickly which sites really do have the influence. Visually it makes it so clear.
Amelia
Excellent blog, btw.
Don't agree with you on the graph.
Wouldn't it be better with a line of best fit to see which were the overvalued and undervalued brands?
Posted by: david | Wednesday, 04 April 2007 at 08:53 PM
Hi David, I guess that you can simply look at the market value and the number of people who engage with the brand to get a cost per user. But hard to say what is over/under valued surely as we can't predict what future usage is?
Posted by: Amelia Torode | Thursday, 05 April 2007 at 09:38 AM
Hi David, I guess that you can simply look at the market value and the number of people who engage with the brand to get a cost per user. But hard to say what is over/under valued surely as we can't predict what future usage is?
Posted by: Amelia Torode | Thursday, 05 April 2007 at 09:39 AM
I've long had doubts over Alexa's method of ranking, but do think this graph is compelling, even if ot does invite nit-picking.
I haven't seen it before - well spotted.
Posted by: FishNChimps | Friday, 13 April 2007 at 11:57 AM